This post pushed me to upgrade my subscription. :)
But if I may make one suggestion, I think you should reject the secular "alpha, beta" terminology and replace those category names with the names or types which you use as examples. (David, Jonathon, etc.)
I'm been thinking about the growing recognition of the importance of "memesis" and how models for behavior are so powerful. I think focusing on these "types" through quintessential archetypes would be more powerful and more biblical.
This post pushed me to upgrade my subscription. :)
But if I may make one suggestion, I think you should reject the secular "alpha, beta" terminology and replace those category names with the names or types which you use as examples. (David, Jonathon, etc.)
I'm been thinking about the growing recognition of the importance of "memesis" and how models for behavior are so powerful. I think focusing on these "types" through quintessential archetypes would be more powerful and more biblical.
What if I am female and see myself in here? lol but seriously?